By Hub staff report. Johns Hopkins University is asking all faculty, staff, and students to become familiar with a Personal Relationships Policy that goes into effect July 1. The policy was developed with input from the university community, including in-person and online feedback to a draft policy that was circulated publicly in the spring. It provides guidance on how to avoid conflicts of interest and potential negative impacts on both the integrity of student-teacher relationships and the workplace climate. In summary, university affiliates may not have academic or professional influence including teaching, grading, evaluating, supervising, or influencing progress to graduation over someone with whom they have a personal relationship, including a family relationship or a dating, romantic, or sexual relationship. If two individuals have a personal relationship, or had one in the past, they must avoid any situation involving academic or professional influence through a written disclosure and recusal process. The person with the authority is primarily responsible for this action. No dating, romantic, or sexual relationships are allowed between faculty members and undergraduate students. Influence is understood to be present, regardless of whether there is direct academic authority. University leaders have asked each division to incorporate the policy into their faculty, student, and staff handbooks and orientation materials.
Physical contact is not a required element of such relationships. A Covered Relationship may exist on the basis of a single interaction. The University of Michigan strives to create and maintain a community that enables each person to reach their full potential. To do so requires an environment of trust, openness, civility, and respect. The teacher-student relationship lies at the foundation of the educational process.
Policy on Romantic and Sexual Relationships Between Faculty/Staff and Graduate Sexual Relationships Between Faculty/Staff and Undergraduate Students.
Sexual or romantic relationships may raise concerns of conflict of interest, abuse of authority, favoritism, and unfair treatment when both people are in the MIT work or academic environment, and one person holds a position of power or authority over the other. These relationships may also affect others in the work or academic environment, undermining the integrity of their supervision and evaluation as well. These concerns exist even when the relationship is considered consensual by both individuals.
In some instances, consent may not be as freely given as the more senior person in the relationship believes. Because of the possible adverse effects on the other party and on their fellow students, co-workers, colleagues, and others, the Institute prohibits all faculty, other academic instructional staff, other employees, and other non-student members of the MIT community paid or unpaid from having sexual or romantic relationships with certain MIT students and employees, whether or not the relationship is consensual.
A summary of this policy is as follows, with more detail in the noted sections:. Where this policy imposes a duty to notify and recuse, that duty falls on the person in the position of power or authority in the relationship. Where required, notification and recusal must take place as soon as practical after any action has been taken by either party to establish a sexual or romantic relationship.
Faculty, other academic instructional staff , other employees, and other members of the MIT community other than MIT students are prohibited from having a sexual or romantic relationship with any undergraduate student at MIT. Such relationships with undergraduates are always prohibited.
This policy was approved by the Board of Trustees on June 21, The University has a duty to provide for the student those privileges, opportunities, and protections which best promote the learning process in all its aspects. The relationship between an instructor  and a student plays an important role in accomplishing this mission. Certain responsibilities bestowed upon instructors have long been codified in the Faculty Rights and Responsibilities policy:.
The teacher has the responsibility to encourage the pursuit of learning by students by manifesting the best academic standards of the discipline or profession. To accord students respect as individuals, the teacher shall seek to establish a relationship of mutual trust and to establish an appropriate role as an intellectual guide, counselor and mentor, both in and out of the classroom.
Applies to: Regular Instructional Faculty, Supplemental Instructional Faculty, Research Faculty, Graduate Student Instructors, and Undergraduate Students.
Jump to navigation. With professional responsibility comes power. It is incumbent on faculty members not to abuse, nor to seem to abuse, the power with which they are entrusted. Faculty members are prohibited from initiating or engaging in romantic or sexual behavior with undergraduate students at Princeton University. Faculty members are also prohibited from requesting or accepting sexual favors from undergraduate students at Princeton University. Faculty members are defined as tenured, tenure-track faculty, instructors, and lecturers.
Undergraduate students include those matriculating at Princeton as well as those from other institutions who come to Princeton for pre-bac, visiting, summer, and post-bac programs. Contact the Office of the Dean of the Faculty for policies relating to consensual relations with students for Academic Professionals. Princeton University. In addition, no faculty member, researcher, graduate student, visiting student, or undergraduate course assistant shall initiate or engage in a romantic or sexual behavior with any student, including a graduate student or DCE student, who is enrolled in a course taught by that individual or otherwise subject to that individual’s academic supervision or evaluation.
Academic supervision includes teaching, advising, supervising research, supervising teaching or grading, and serving as Departmental Representative or DGS of the student’s academic program. Academic evaluation includes assigning grades, evaluating degree progress, serving as a committee member, and providing letters of reference. Beyond these prohibited relations, all romantic or sexual relationships between individuals of different University status require heightened awareness. For example, a faculty member may wish to initiate a personal relationship with an individual over whom he or she has no current professional supervisory responsibility.
Would a graduate student date an undergrad?
The Jackson School has student opportunities for research among our different themes and disciplines. Learn more about the current graduate and undergraduate student research opportunities. Skip to main content. Education One of the largest geosciences communities in the world.
Somewhere in the middle of the policy mix, the University of Wisconsin System in banned faculty-student dating (graduate or undergraduate).
CSU is committed to the principle that its personnel shall carry out their duties in an objective and ethical fashion and in an atmosphere in which conflicts of interest are identified and managed. CSU does not interfere with private choices regarding personal relationships when these relationships do not interfere with the goals and policies of CSU. However, consensual romantic or sexual relationships in which one party retains a direct supervisory or evaluative role over the other party have the potential to interfere with these goals and policies.
Therefore, consistent with its commitment to objectivity and ethical behavior, CSU is required to intervene in such circumstances. A romantic, intimate, or sexual relationship in which one individual is in a position to exercise authority over the other creates conflicts of interest and perceptions of undue advantage or disadvantage.
Pursuant to this policy, faculty members are prohibited from entering into consensual, intimate relationships with students over whom they exercise authority. Retaliation against persons who report concerns about consensual relationships is also prohibited and constitutes a violation of this policy. Search Catalog. Class Schedule Search. Consensual Relationships Catalog Navigation.
University Policies Toggle University Policies. About the Catalog Toggle About the Catalog. Financial Information Toggle Financial Information.
Consensual Relationships Policy
Brandeis University is committed to maintaining a fair and professional academic, work and athletic environment in which members of the faculty and staff carry out their responsibilities in a way that is both respectful to those over whom they have authority and conducive to the development of a just and flourishing academic community. A sexual or romantic relationship between a faculty or a staff member and a person with whom they have professional responsibility i.
With professional responsibility comes power. It is incumbent on faculty and staff members not to abuse, or seem to abuse, the power with which they are entrusted. In order to avoid potential conflicts of interest, favoritism, exploitation, harassment or breaches of professional standards, the university prohibits romantic or sexual relationships, even when consensual, where there is supervision, direction or control between the parties.
This policy applies to all faculty and staff employees of Brandeis University.
This is the main listing of events for the adult undergraduate and graduate programs at Avila University.
She is from the same school, but from a different department. Is it ethical for me to date her? I hope it’s ethical! My husband was a graduate student at the university I’m a professor at, in a different department in the same school, when we started dating. In separate departments, that’s not likely to be an issue: most assistant professors at most universities don’t have power over graduate students in other departments.
Does Cornell have a policy about non-romantic relationships between TAs and undergrads?
In no case will a regulation be waived or an exception be granted because students plead ignorance of, or contend that they were not informed of, the regulations and procedures. Responsibility for following all policies and meeting all requirements and deadlines for graduate programs rests with the student. In addition to the policies and procedures found on this website, please refer to the University Catalog.
After at least 30 days of probation, the degree-granting program can dismiss any graduate student who is deemed to be making insufficient academic progress or whose. Submitting a request Students are able to request a leave of absence from their academic program.
In addition, no faculty member, researcher, graduate student, visiting student, or undergraduate course assistant shall initiate or engage in a romantic or sexual.
R omantic relationships between university professors and their students are becoming less and less acceptable. Many of the new university policies that have emerged in the last few years have focused on undergraduates and how to better protect them, typically with a campus-wide ban on staff dating undergrads. But a number of universities also demand that faculty members do not start relationships with graduate students they supervise.
This month, Princeton University went further and declared that faculty members were no longer allowed to date any graduate student—even if the couple works in different departments. Pre-existing relationships are exempt from the new rule. The university is encouraging greater collaboration across departments, Burdine says, which extends the concerns about unequal power between a professor and a student beyond the immediate supervisory relationship.
Princeton is the first university to take the campus-wide step but others will follow, says Jamelle Sharpe , who works at the University of Illinois College of Law in Urbana-Champaign and has surveyed academic policies in this area. Sharpe is leading a cross-campus review of the University of Illinois regulations, and his team will make recommendations later this year. He says universities have traditionally distinguished between undergraduates and graduate students when they set consensual relationships policy, and assumed that undergrads need more protection.
But he says that may no longer be appropriate.